News on the Missed Call Marketing Story
We have been contacted by Mr Kelvin Evans who has threatened legal action if we do not remove the information provided by COB today.
Mr Evans claims that he is not the mastermind behind the Missed Call Marketing scheme, of course not knowing the evidence we have at hand. Suffice to say it would stand up nicely in court if it ever went that far.
However, we thought it would be fair to offer Mr Evans a chance to convince us and have asked for answers to the following questions (not all questions are published here):
- Is it true that you programmed a dialler which systematically dialled mobile numbers in Australia with the only purpose to leave a caller ID on the recipient’s phone, so the mobile phone user would be enticed to call the number back?
- Is it true that you offered this dialler to multiple clients in order to run all kinds of promotions?
- Is it true that for providing this service, you received a revenue share of the monies earned on 1900 numbers used for the promotions?
- Is it true that only 190 service bureaus - like Info FM - can get 190 numbers provisioned?
So far we have not received a reply, so we do not feel any pressure to remove any of the posts as demanded.
« Telstra vs Oxygen 8 – a PR exercise? // Luck of the Irish »
Leave a Comments »
Trackback | RSS 2.0
It’s a very interesting point of view and items that I would like to know more as the interpersonal attitude is something that is not given much information.